Logo Mobile Logo
  • Home
  • News
    • Social Feed
  • About
  • Resources
    • EIA Coal Data
    • Coal Facts
    • License Plate
    • Ladies Auxiliary
  • Stickers
  • Join
  • Action Alerts
  • Contact

Press

Yeatman: Pests over People - Humans are Collateral Damage in the War on Coal

Parent Category: News

By William Yeatman

Just because coal is an inanimate object doesn't mean President Obama's war on coal avoids human casualties. I witnessed the collateral damage to coal-dependent communities on Tuesday at the Charleston Civic Center in West Virginia, where hundreds of people gathered to demand that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) spare their livelihoods.

In Mr. Obama's war on coal, the most intensive front has been waged against a particular kind of mining, known as mountain-top removal (MTR). It involves blowing off the top of mountains to get at the underlying coal seams, and it is essential for the Appalachian coal industry's competitiveness vis-a-vis growing production west of the Mississippi. But it is anathema to environmentalists, a major constituency within the president's Democratic Party.

Read more: Yeatman: Pests over People - Humans are Collateral Damage in the War on Coal

Logan Airport & National Guard: A Dream Come True for ERT

Parent Category: News

MELVILLE — Roger Ramey smiled as he stood on the landing strip at the Logan County Airport yesterday and watched the Hercules C-130 aircraft land.

Ramey, who retired after 20 years in the U.S. Air Force and is the senior board member on the Logan County Airport Authority, said watching the airplane land was a "dream come true."

"This is a lifelong dream," Ramey said. "When I was in the Air Force and stationed overseas in the 1970s, I heard through my parents that they were planning to build an airport here. I thought I'd spent enough time in the Air Force that I could come back to Logan and get a job at the airport. It didn't progress as big and as fast as I'd have liked and I spent 20 years in the Air Force and when I got out, we came back to Logan and I got a job with the railroad.

Read more: Logan Airport & National Guard: A Dream Come True for ERT

WV Coal Hall of Fame Inductees 2010

Parent Category: News

LAURITA AND HOWARD NAMED TO WEST VIRGINIA COAL HALL OF FAME
Nicewonder joins to accept his 2009 award at annual meeting in Glade Springs
 
 
CHARLESTON – The West Virginia Coal Association and the West Virginia Coal Mining Institute are proud to name Thomas W. Howard and James Lewis Laurita (Jim, Sr.) as the 2010 inductees to the West Virginia Coal Hall of Fame. Laurita and Howard were joined in accepting the award by Don Nicewonder, who received his 2009 induction. Nicewonder had been unable to attend this past year.
 
“This is the highest honor our industry can bestow,” said Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association. “This award is given to people who devote a lifetime of service to our industry and our state.  I am so proud to be able to say I know these three gentlemen and count them as friends. They are gentlemen in every sense of the word. They embody the very best of our industry. Their lives of hard work, commitment to excellence and commitment to the state and its people truly light the way for the rest of us to follow.”

Read more: WV Coal Hall of Fame Inductees 2010

Questions About Spruce No. 1 Mine Public Hearing

Parent Category: News



Q: When and where is the Public Hearing for the Spruce No. 1 Surface Mine Proposed Determination?

A: EPA Region 3 will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 at the Charleston Civic Center (South Hall) in Charleston, West Virginia.

Q: Where is the Civic Center located?

A: The Charleston Civic Center is located at 200 Civic Center Drive, Charleston, West Virginia. Their phone number is 304-345-1500.

Q: What is the purpose of the Public Hearing?

A: EPA is holding the public hearing to obtain public testimony or comment on EPA’s proposed 404(c) action on the Spruce No. 1 Mine project.

Q: Is the Public Hearing open to anyone?

A: Anyone may appear at the hearing and submit oral and/or written statements or data. On-site registration to speak will begin at 5 p.m.

Q: What about people who have special needs?

A: For those who have special needs and require auxiliary aids and/or services to fully participate in the public hearing, please call 215-814-2760.

Q: Are advanced sign-ups being accepted?

A: Yes. In anticipation of the large turnout for the hearing, advanced sign-up is recommended due to time and capacity limitations, especially for those planning to make oral comments.

Q: How do I sign up?

A: To sign up go to http://www.epa.gov/region3/mtntop/spruce1hearing.html and click on the link which reads “Registering ahead of time is recommended.” You may also sign-up by phone at 877-368-3552.

Q: How do I submit my comments?

A: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No EPA-R03-OW-2009-0985, by one of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal (recommended method of comment submission): http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Or, go directly to the comments page for this action.

E-mail: ow-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Include the docket number, EPA-R03-OW-2009-0985, in the subject line of the message.

Mail:

‘‘EPA-R03-OW-2009-0985, Spruce No. 1 Surface Mine’’
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Docket Center Water Docket, Mail Code 28221T
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460

Hand Delivery or Courier:
Director, Office of Environmental Programs
Environmental Assessment and Innovation Division (3EA30)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation, which are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays.

Submit at the Public Hearing: Written comments may also be presented at the hearing.

The Facts

Parent Category: News

  • At full production the mine would employ 235 miners and create another 300 indirect and induced jobs in the area.
  • The jobs created by the Spruce permit would be high-paying, long-term employment opportunities.  These jobs would pay approximately $70,000 annually with full benefits.
  • Total economic impact of this operation is estimated at approximately $15 0 million annually.
  • The Spruce operation is projected to produce approximately  …..
  • The permit is the most scrutinized mining permit in history  in West Virginia or the Appalachian region.
  • During the permit’s 10 year review, the original mine design and production levels were significantly reduced to address the concerns of the EPA -- for example, the final permitted acreage was reduced by 27 percent and the fill placement was reduced by 57 percent. Total recoverable reserves of coal were reduced by 10.6 million tons as a result.
  • The Spruce mine permit was issued in June 1007. Coal production has commenced and the initial workforce has been hired and is working.
  • EPA participated along with the other agencies every step of the way during the permit’s 10 year review and had previously praised the company’s efforts to redesign the application.
  • If the EPA revokes the Spruce permit, it will be the first time such an action has been taken on a mining project and only the 14th time the EPA has exercised that option since the program was created in 1972.
  • It is an unprecedented action to revoke a permit that has already been issued and production, employment and investment has been mobilized.
  • A decision by the EPA to revoke an issued permit will forever cast doubt over the validity of any permit obtained anywhere in West Virginia for any industry -- not just coal mining!
  • The EPA has continued to delay a decision on whether or not to revoke the permit ... It has had more than enough time to make its decision and should not delay any longer. Further delay on an official decision allows the EPA to pocket veto the permit by doing nothing.
  • EPA’s concerns regarding the Spruce Mine have been addressed by the State of West Virginia through its environmental programs. The fact that EPA continues to disregard these conclusions is further evidence that the agency has no respect for the state’s environmental programs or the  sovereignty of the Legislature to promulgate environmental protection standards.

Bus Transports

Parent Category: News



Logan -- TBA
Pikeville --  TBA
Danville --  TBA
Beckley --  TBA
Bluefield --  TBA
Huntington -- TBA

History

Parent Category: News



As the most carefully scrutinized and fully considered mine permit in West Virginia's history, the Spruce No. 1 permit was legally issued in 2007. The nearly 10-year permitting process included the preparation of a full environmental impact statement. The EPA was intimately involved in the preparation and approval of the Spruce permit, making today’s news even more difficult to understand. - Arch Coal

Documents

Parent Category: News
  1. WV DEP Letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers responding to EPA claims and arguments that the Spruce permit should be revoked.
  2. Corps of Engineers letter responding to EPA claims relative to the Spruce Mine
  3. Senate Concurrent Resolution adopted by the Legislature during the regular session, urging EPA not to revoke the Spruce Mine.
  4. Letter from Senator Rockefeller to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson regarding the Spruce Mine Permit.
  5. Statement from Congresswoman Shelly Moore Capito on EPA’s decision to revoke the Spruce Mine Permit.
  6. Statement from Congressman Nick Joe Rahall on the Spruce No. 1 Mine Permit
  7. Chart from EPA—how the Section 404(c) veto process works.

Previous Statements

Parent Category: News



This federal bureaucracy is misleading, and is adding excessive red tape that is affecting people’s livelihoods. Government should be a facilitator and partner, not a hindrance to Americans working to obtain the American Dream – and that is to have a good job, make a decent wage and provide for their family.” -  Gov. Joe Manchin, West Virginia.

“[A]t some point, a project must be deemed to have been studied enough to meet NEPA’s requirements. This is the most heavily studied and scrutinized surface mining coal operation in the history of a state which has a long history with the coal mining industry.”
-  West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection

“The WVDEP is committed to the application of the existing laws, rules and policies to protect the environment. … It does not support retroactive, ad hoc departures from existing laws rules and guidelines.” - West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection

“There are 250 jobs at risk in that mine. The Spruce #1 permit has been in operation over two years and Arch has worked hard to comply with every request from the EPA. If this veto is allowed to stand then any mine permit is at risk.  There is a possible $150 million in taxes, miners wages and payments to suppliers and area businesses at stake if this permit is allowed to be stopped permanently,”
-  Sen. Ron D. Stollings, (D-Boone, Logan, Lincoln)

“This decision by EPA is reckless and arbitrary. It establishes a dangerous precedent in that it reneges on an already approved permit --- something that has never been done previously. In doing so, it brings into question the reliability of the entire permitting process and shows an arrogant disregard for the impacts this will have on the state’s economy and its people.” - Bill Raney, president, West Virginia Coal Association

  1. Come to Charleston May 18th for an EPA Hearing on Spruce Mine!
  2. Thank You, West Virginians
  3. Journalist moved by Mountain State residents after mine tragedy
  4. Modern life depends on miners

200 Association Drive | Suite 160; Charleston, WV 25311 | 304-342-4153 | website developed by brickswithoutstraw